<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Morning Joe</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/morning_joe</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Morning Joe</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Scarborough embellished as &#x22;reporting&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;WSJ&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial&#x27;s one-sided echo of Coleman&#x27;s recount accusation</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200901050012</link>
<description>MSNBC&#x27;s Joe Scarborough falsely suggested that assertions in &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; about the Minnesota Senate race were the result of &#x22;reporting,&#x22; including the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s reference to &#x22;double counting&#x22; in the race. But in claiming that there was &#x22;double counting,&#x22; the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not cite reporting and echoed an accusation by the campaign of the incumbent, Republican Norm Coleman.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200901050012</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:56:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scarborough on door of his &#x22;American car&#x22; freezing shut: &#x22;[P]robably some Japanese engineer ... sabotaged us. Kinda like blowing up things at Pearl Harbor&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812220010</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, shortly after Mika Brzezinski remarked that the weather was &#x22;so cold&#x22; that &#x22;[i]t&#x27;ll freeze your car door shut,&#x22; Joe Scarborough recounted, &#x22;I tried to turn the key, and it was ... locked.&#x22; Then, in response to Brzezinski&#x27;s comment, &#x22;Oh, American car. That&#x27;s the problem,&#x22; Scarborough declared: &#x22;The American car -- you know what? It&#x27;s probably some Japanese engineer that made the key hold -- just sabotaged us. Kinda like blowing up things at Pearl Harbor.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812220010</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:01:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scarborough&#x27;s explanation for repeatedly saying Franken &#x22;can steal&#x22; votes: &#x22;I&#x27;m like a scientist. This is a theory that I&#x27;m trying out&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812190003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Joe Scarborough again claimed that Al Franken &#x22;can steal&#x22; enough votes in the Minnesota Senate race to emerge victorious, marking at least the sixth time Scarborough has invoked &#x22;steal[ing]&#x22; votes since the recount began. Scarborough later denied that he was &#x22;saying Al Franken&#x27;s stealing votes&#x22; but was instead &#x22;just saying how easy would it be for Al Franken to steal 150 [votes].&#x22; He added: &#x22;I&#x27;m like a scientist. This is a theory that I&#x27;m trying out there.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812190003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:01:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; continues obsession over &#x22;steal[ing]&#x22; votes in Minnesota</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812160014</link>
<description>Previously having stated that Democrat Al Franken &#x22;only needs to steal 130 more votes to win&#x22; his race against Republican Sen. Norm Coleman for Minnesota&#x27;s U.S. Senate seat, MSNBC&#x27;s Joe Scarborough again raised the subject of &#x22;steal[ing]&#x22; votes on the December 16 edition of &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; -- at least the fifth time he has made such comments since the recount began on November 19. After co-host Mika Brzezinski reported that Franken is behind Coleman by 188 votes, Scarborough asked Pat Buchanan, &#x22;Buchanan, can you steal 188 out of 1,500? That&#x27;s easy, right?&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812160014</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:49:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Heads still in the &#x22;clouds&#x22;: Media continue to use term to baselessly link Obama to Blagojevich scandal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812150008</link>
<description>In the absence of any allegations of wrongdoing by President-elect Barack Obama or his staff in connection with the scandal involving Gov. Rod Blagojevich, media figures continue to warn that a &#x22;cloud&#x22; hangs over Obama or assert that the scandal threatens to cast a &#x22;cloud&#x22; over Obama&#x27;s presidency.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812150008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:41:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Responding to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Scarborough again suggests that Franken &#x22;steal&#x22; votes</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812090002</link>
<description>Joe Scarborough responded to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; highlighting of his assertions that Al Franken &#x22;only needs to steal&#x22; a small number of votes to win his Senate race, by saying: &#x22;Can I have my &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; moment here, because it drives them crazy when I say this. How many -- how many votes does Al Franken have to steal to get elected in Minnesota? OK, there, I&#x27;ve said it. Now you guys can write another article. That&#x27;s my little present to you.&#x22; He continued: &#x22;Now, for the record, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, I&#x27;ve never accused Al Franken of stealing votes. I just asked Pat Buchanan, &#x27;Hey, how many -- he needs 250 votes. Would those votes be hard to steal?&#x27; And, of course, Pat said, &#x27;No, I&#x27;ve got those in the back of my station wagon, Joe.&#x27; &#x22;&#x3C;br /&#x3E;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812090002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:51:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; debunks claim that union autoworkers are &#x22;paid 70 bucks an hour&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812040008</link>
<description>Debunking the false claim, advanced by many in the media, that autoworkers employed by U.S. auto manufacturers receive $70 or more per hour in wages and benefits, Bob Shrum said on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; that &#x22;there&#x27;s this one crazy statistic&#x22; that autoworkers are &#x22;paid 70 bucks an hour.&#x22; Mike Barnicle added: &#x22;The $77 an hour thing is not true. It&#x27;s the compilation of all the benefits.&#x22; Joe Scarborough later stated, &#x22;[J]ust so everybody knows, when we talk about $77 or $45, we&#x27;re not only talking about the money, the benefits, everything else, retirement, we&#x27;re also talking about the money to -- the legacy costs of the existing retirees.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812040008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Dec 2008 13:06:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scarborough again baselessly claimed Franken can &#x22;steal&#x22; votes in Minnesota Senate race</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200811210010</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Joe Scarborough again suggested that Al Franken is willing to &#x22;steal&#x22; votes in order to prevail against Sen. Norm Coleman. In making the suggestion, Scarborough again gave no evidence of any wrongdoing by Franken. Gov. Tim Pawlenty stated as recently as November 16 that &#x22;[a]s of this moment, there is no actual evidence of wrongdoing or fraud in the process.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200811210010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:19:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Joe Scarborough: &#x22;If Al Franken steals enough votes in Minnesota, [Dems] get to 60&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200811190006</link>
<description>Discussing the possibility of Democrats gaining a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, Joe Scarborough stated, &#x22;So, with [Sen. Ted] Stevens losing, Democrats have 58 [senators and Senator-elects]. They&#x27;ve got this run-off in Georgia, which could get them to 59. ... If Al Franken steals enough votes in Minnesota, they get to 60. I&#x27;m not saying he stole any votes, I&#x27;m just saying, as a Republican from Florida, I mean, it&#x27;s a close race. Steal some votes, you get over the top.&#x22; In fact, Minnesota Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty has repeatedly said there is no actual evidence of fraud in the vote count of the state&#x27;s Senate race.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200811190006</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:08:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring McCain&#x27;s immigration reversal, NBC&#x27;s Mitchell said &#x22;dramatic shift in the Hispanic vote&#x22; toward Obama is a &#x22;sad irony for John McCain&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200811030017</link>
<description>Andrea Mitchell said it was &#x22;a great irony, a sad irony, for John McCain&#x22; that Hispanic voters are &#x22;shifting to Barack Obama&#x22; even though McCain &#x22;lost his Republican base ... partly on supporting immigration reform.&#x22; But Mitchell did not note that McCain reversed his position on immigration reform, aligning himself more closely with the GOP base, or that McCain stated that he would not support his own reform bill if it came up for a vote in the Senate.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200811030017</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Nov 2008 17:58:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scarborough falsely claimed Obama said the Warren Court was &#x22;not, quote, &#x27;radical enough&#x27; &#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810280021</link>
<description>Joe Scarborough falsely claimed that, during a 2001 radio interview, Sen. Barack Obama said that &#x22;the Warren Court was not, quote, &#x27;radical enough.&#x27; &#x22; In fact, Obama didn&#x27;t say the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren was not &#x22;radical enough.&#x22; Scarborough also falsely claimed that during the interview Obama said &#x22;the Warren Court did not go far enough, that actually one of the great tragedies was there was no redistribution of wealth.&#x22; In fact, the &#x22;traged[y]&#x22; Obama identified during the interview was that the civil rights movement relied too much on the courts in its efforts to bring about political and economic justice.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810280021</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:19:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Buchanan overstates Democratic support for Alito and Roberts on Supreme Court confirmation votes</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810200014</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Pat Buchanan misrepresented Senate votes by Democrats on the confirmations of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Samuel Alito, saying, &#x22;Roberts probably got 25 Democrats, Alito probably got a dozen.&#x22; In fact, four Democrats voted to confirm Alito, while Roberts received 22 votes from Democrats.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810200014</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:55:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Selectively citing Gallup poll&#x27;s findings, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; joined Drudge Report in touting &#x22;Gallup shock&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810170015</link>
<description>MSNBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe &#x3C;/em&#x3E;echoed the Drudge Report by displaying the on-screen text &#x22;Gallup shock&#x22; and selectively citing only one of three findings from an October 13-15 Gallup daily tracking poll of the presidential race -- the one that showed Sen. Barack Obama holding his smallest lead over Sen. John McCain.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810170015</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:48:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scarborough misquoted Obama regarding Lewis remarks, then called the statement Obama didn&#x27;t make &#x22;shocking&#x22; and &#x22;staggering&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810160016</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Joe Scarborough falsely asserted that Sen. Barack Obama said during the October 15 presidential debate that Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) &#x22;drew appropriate comparisons&#x22; in a statement invoking George Wallace and a church bombing in criticizing &#x22;the negative tone of the McCain-Palin campaign.&#x22; In fact, Obama said that Lewis &#x22;&#x3C;em&#x3E;inappropriately &#x3C;/em&#x3E;drew a comparison between what was happening [at McCain-Palin rallies] and what had happened during the civil rights movement, and we immediately put out a statement saying that we don&#x27;t think that comparison is appropriate&#x22; [emphasis added].</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810160016</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:01:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media continue to repeat Cindy McCain&#x27;s comment about troop funding without noting her husband&#x27;s own vote &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;br /&#x3E;
&#x3C;/em&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810090006</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported Cindy McCain&#x27;s attack on Sen. Barack Obama that his &#x22;vote to not fund my son while he was serving sent a cold chill through my body.&#x22; However, none of their reports noted that Sen. John McCain himself voted against legislation to fund the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810090006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:23:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>